>>19391674>election was subject to multiple recounts >verdict not even final
Gee what a shock, the idiot who falls for the scam of modern democracy isn't informed. The opposite of what OP wants to be.
Tell me, why do you think this story, irrelevant and unstable as it is, warranted getting so much attention and articles written about it? Because it was a freak occurrence. An extremely unlikely stroke of luck. Tell me, when you see someone on /adv/ complaining about having financial problems, do you advise them "just win the lottery", and then post stories about other people winning the lottery with it's 1/1000000 chances as proof that your advice has any merit?
You're a moron. And what's even worse, you're a content moron. Someone unwilling to see the reality of their situation and thus does nothing to escape it. And what's even worse than all of that, you're a content moron who tries to convince others to be content morons alongside you. The odds of a single vote ever influencing anything are slim to none, and the odds of the thing it influencing actually mattering on any kind of significant scale are so close to zero as to not matter. You have to do something like what I said if you ever want to truly influence the world.
No doubt you're going to give some sub-2-sentence reply now since that's all your tiny brain can manage to process. A reply again with no substance or even effort of logical refutation of my points, but instead of petty insults and extremely cherrypicked stories. Though I guess I shouldn't expect much else from a moron.