>>24658794>i see absolutely no correlation between the two design-wise
kek, i here copes the mazda cuck cope. the Firebird somehow looks nothing like the Rx7, but the C5 looks like the Rx7.>they were both released the same production year
We're not talking about production cars. we're talking about concept cars. the Firebird concept was shown to exist before any pictures of an FD you can find dated for 1988. they were just drawing sketches for the FD in 1988. that's when the entire project began. the timeline is not the same. one clearly was later in development before the other.>to reiterate: c5 is almost half decade after the rx7.
This doesn't mean anything when GM already established their design language for the 90s before Mazda.
corvette is behind the curve by multiple years >and ive shown examples of their unoriginality across the 40 years.
You only gave vague examples of what the C6, and C7 look like. the C7's headlights somehow look like a 599, but your cognitive dissonance will suggest the FD and Firebird concept look nothing alike. whilst trying to claim the C5 looks like the Rx7. either the C5 looks like the Rx7, which itself looks like the Firebird, or they all have nothing in common. can't be both.
god damn. the amount of mental gymnastics.