>>123260958>I don't understand this. They're giving this guy billions to experiment with rockets and yet they keep cutting NASA's budget.
Zero emission business and clean energy are more important than Space X. >>123261414
NASA has problem with lack long term goals. One presidential admin starts something or other, next one cancels it or possibly musical chairs in senate or house ends up differently than previous time and opponents pet projects get cancelled. >shilling on about global coo-, I mean war-, I mean climate change. They need to be devoted to space shit, we already have several climate agencies (National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, etc) and we need a real space agency.
Earth observation satellites are one of best things space programs have given to the world. Space agency can do stuff that is way out of NOAA's or NWS reach.