>>89122569>How do you don't know it fail before testing it?I'm going to give you some credit because you clearly don't speak very much English.
"fail-deadly" is the opposite of "fail-safe" it means that when a failure in command and control happens the automatic response is to attack. This is how most guided weapons work after they've reached a certain guidance phase, usually the terminal phase, prior to that they fail-safe which means if a serious error occurs the attack is aborted, usually the weapon self destructs to prevent it from striking an unintended target. Also electronics do not work in terms of verbal commands, you send encrypted signals to them and the electronic systems respond to them in the way that they are designed to, there is no thought or choice or interpretation involved, this applies to all electronics period.
>An "AI" who can be kept from firing by radio jamming is no improvement over a droneAn AI that deliberately attacks allies when jammed is worse than a drone. There are already non-AI drones that fly themselves back to friendly airspace when jammed.
>Do you want AI wingman who don't shoot if there's jamming?Yes, because the alternative is a fratricidal AI wingman that will attack allies when jammed. If the AI attacks anything it can get a solution on by default and the only thing preventing that is an operator you can induce it to commit fratricide by jamming it.
