>>64122463>it was a playtest and not the final product which will have much more to it>In the final version there are supposedly going to be much more.
I'll say it again. The best part of a non-existent product is that they're almost always perfect. You can hide behind your excuses of "They'll fix it! It'll be great! You can't prove me wrong!" but I'm not falling for your crap.>Im talking even an easy DC was impossible
The hell is an easy stealth DC? It's an opposed check. Opposed. Check. There's no chart for what a DC 5 Stealth check represents. You literally don't understand how Pathfinder 1E works.>And you character gets better by watching them during down time, by trying out these things while performing maintenance every night.
Who says there's a person in the party with those skills? Who says I maintain my gear myself? And yet going up one level is effectively like going from trained to expert whether I like it or not.
You know, I should have expected you to be a Paizo shill from your very first post.>Well the playtest AP wasn't meant to be fun
Who the f*ck releases an adventure that's not meant to be fun? It's literally the point of the game.>Everything was over tuned and nasty to provide better data for later revisions.
That is precisely the wrong way to run a playtest. You don't get balanced feedback if you don't present an accurate representation of what the final game will look like.
Talking with you is pointless. Your literal first sentence proves how far into their pocket you are. You entered a thread whose very premise you disagreed with and started stirring shit. Well, you got what you wanted. Now get out.