>>1757394It doesn't matter that every anthropological study that's ever been made implies that humans need casual sex as much as dolphins and bonobos as an essential part of socialization and acknowledgement.
No.
In today's civilized world, we need to breed criminal men and helpless women by making sex so precious that people will run all their lives in the hamster wheel for a glimpse of tits on TV or even (oh my God) sex, which humans have evolved to have more or less whenever they felt like it as a basic socialization tool.
In order to forget that they're being deprived of even a role in society in the form of a job, the entire new generation is being whipped around by twisted expectations regarding sex entirely made up by a series of fat cats starting with Victorian businessmen using "for the children" as a way to make people ignore other unsavory practices.
Humans are wired for a society where sex is something casual and easily accessible, as seen by how prostitution worked until the Victorian era.
You pay woman wage appropriate to X minutes' worth of activity, you have those X minutes of activity and you leave.
And no one considers sex so outrageously valuable that all of Heaven and Earth have to be overturned.
If a 2/10 woman came to me and asked if I'd have sex with her, I'd say yes unless she was literally crawling with lice and dripping with mud, because while I am not a particularly virtuous human being, hearing out someone else's request and fulfilling it because it won't take that much of your time is a basic thing that people just do.
Unless it's about sex, of course, in which case a 8/10 man approaching a 2/10 woman is lucky if she doesn't have her finger on the rape keychain.
And she's getting all the more miserable because she, as a human too, wants sex too but she'll be murdered by Big Media if she dares say "sure, I'll bother with you for 20 minutes".
