>>88888306>"Why are men so silent?!" They crow.>The reason men are reluctant to take on powerful men is because they know women instinctively side with whichever male is the most powerful.>Women have a fetish for male power, and you see this in how feminists always portray all men as somehow powerful and thus responsible for everything.>Even feminists, for all their modernity, have a view of masculinity that is actually very conservative and backward.
All good and well delivered points, but feminists are not modern, they are, as you said, very conservative and backward.
The single worst attack you could deliver women is feminism, I think. Imagine forcing them to take accountability for their actions and behaviour. Imagine their intellectual qualities and moral characters being called into question. Power fetish indeed. Women are HOT for monsters and tyrants and are the biggest enablers you will meet until it looks like their pick of the month is about to get soundly destroyed.
As someone who has engaged in a lot of "dethroning" operations with certain characters, I can tell you that, in the beginning, these men have no shortage of female admirers and rat bags, who sit pretty as these men rein terror down on those too weak or too scared to defend themselves.
When he is directly challenged, they will rally round to protect him, fighting for his affections and status gibs.
When he starts getting humiliated and bust up, there is a silence, and a gradual wandering of attentions. Do not be surprised if you get approached by women during this phase. Be sure to listen to all their hot gossip about his weaknesses.
When the target has fully been broken, powerless, weak and pathetic, he will have no one. The ladies will have fled to greener pastures.
Why aren't the guys jumping in? cause this is "feminisms" battle.
I want to watch them all destroy each other and laugh.