>>32558766I pointed out Adam could have burned the Tree to get rid of even the chance of temptation.
People here argued Adam didn't know how to make fire, I don't remember any place in Genesis saying he didn't know how to make fire (now you see why falsifiability is important, hehe), still, I pointed out even if he didn't know how to make fire he could just have made all the animals eat the tree whole, you know, elephants for example would have made a short work of it, eh?
What now? Don't tell me they didn't have elephants and other large herbivores in Eden,
God never forbade other animals, the restriction was exclusive to Adam:
15 The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
So yeah, should have got rid of the tree, problem solved.
