>>33926294you can clearly see the horizon is behind the oil rigs. also see:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/33190178/#33206642>>33926327>muh wavewow thats a nice picture of a wave you have there blocking the oil rigs from view. thanks for sharing. not sure how its relevant tho.
>muh liquid butanethats funny, i never noticed that our atmosphere is composed of liquid butane. oh wait, its not, and youre an intentionally deceptive moron.
>muh iron bent the lightthats not due soleley to atmospheric refraction either.
Heating metal causes electron emission for example. And what do photons interact with? Electrons. So it would be nice to see an example of refraction in the air that wasn't extremely close to a surface.
I have yet to see any example of refraction through air that doesn't take place in close proximity to a solid surface where diffraction might also explain the displacement.
If refraction is taking place, then the laser beam should bend according to the angle at which it strikes the pocket of hot air. You should be able to demonstrate that the refraction follows the formula used to calculate the change in the incident rays if this is to be taken as evidence that refraction is the cause of the displacement.
Why do you think "light bends toward cold air"?
Can you show any scientific publications that support that statement?
Light is said to bend in the atmosphere due to the air density layers that envelope the spherical earth. The surfaces of these layers are thought to be parallel to the earth's surface. Thus light would tend to bend toward the normal when moving from one point on the surface following a tangent line. But it doesn't follow that "light bends toward cold air". That extrapolation indicates a complete misunderstanding of the mechanics of refraction.
also screeching that im a liar just makes you look stupid when i keep proving that youre the one being intentionally deceptive time and time again.
