Now you're not talking about 'body count', but you're still not right to equate virginity with morality.
Every whore was born a virgin. And every single one of them had to have the mindset necessary to become a whore. Conversely, despite doing everything right, some women will get married but justifiably divorce a husband who ends up being abusive or unfaithful.>>25358469
That clown isn't me (how can you not tell the difference between an obvious shitpost of "you must have 50 partners or you're not a man" and "nobody should have sex outside of marriage).
I've been arguing with both hedonists and incels for years, because you have much more in common with each other than people with morals. I've been told to "take the car out for a test drive" as an argument against waiting until marriage by manwhores, by self-proclaimed feminists who also claim to oppose objectification, and by incels. >its completely normal to have a body count of a few guys
What is normal is not what is good, and anyone who accepts the essence of an action has no right to complain about its excess. Imagine applying this "logic" to crimes like murder. >"Oh, yeah, Jimmy over there? He's a good guy, only killed one or two people, nothing like that psychotic asshole Gerald. He killed 6. SIX! The monster!"
Saying that it's okay (even expected) to have sex without commitment, and then adhering to completely arbitrary and unenforceable standards like 'don't have more than 5 partners', is utterly delusional. Someone can reach and then exceed that joke of a standard just by doing what you expect. It's self-defeating.