Sure, and I believe that the trouble you have with the interpretation is motivated reasoning stemming entirely from your pre-commitment to oppose vaccination, which is why I'm not prepared to entertain it.
You managed to identify three "unexplained" cardiac arrests in the vaccinated wing but you were curiously silent about the 2 unexplained organ failures and 2 unexplained myocardial infarctions in the unvaccinated wing. Clearly, by your logic, the vaccine not only prevents COVID but it prevents organ failure and myocardial infarction too. After all, if you can't "explain" it then it must be caused by the vaccine, or lack of it, right?
Your shitty logic breaks down immediately because it is, as I said, entirely motivated reasoning. The cardiac arrests don't require an explanation because in any study of 45,000 people some of them are going to die from random shit.
Your point is especially retarded because this follow-up occurs after the blinded, controlled period, meaning most of the "unvaccinated" wing has ALSO been vaccinated and so we would therefore expect to see elevated cardiac arrests in BOTH groups, not just one of them.>>332346803
The goalposts are exactly where they always were. The vaccine is safe, it works, and there's no reason not to get it.