>>367930603>We know on the face of it Azov is a group funded and armed by NATO and Israel
which means nothing, as both nato and israel have a poor track record of funding and arming groups that would go on to fight them later. the former more so than the latter.
you think like a nato commander, which is why you make the same mistake they do.
SOMEONE TAKING YOUR MONEY DOES NOT MEAN YOU CONTROL THEM, THIS IS THE LAST TIME I WILL REMIND YOU OF THIS.
believing it does should be categorised as a mental illness, granted how many people have died and how many billions have been lost to this conceit over decades. what gives control over an organisation like azov is control - power to inflict violence on them at will, something that zelensky's tinpot govt lacks.>and they do the bidding of the current administration of Ukraine, which is a globohomo cookie jar.
;do the bidding,' what? defending ukrainian territory? what possible ulterior motive could a militant nationalist organisation have to be on the front lines fighting russia while zelensky minces around in western europe?
he panders to the retarded drivel of the hens who are supposed to support him, while azov earns the laurels from actual ukrainians. how daft are you, mate?>nations using
keyword is 'using.' ukraine's govt is not strong enough to 'use' a group like azov, that is what you refuse to understand.>Russia is part of this on the same side of nato and the US
globohomo is on all state-sides. it is not reducible to nato and the us because you happen to live under a nato government. you are not thinking straight, this isn't a war of poz vs neg, it is a war over who embodies the ideal of being pozzed the most.
swap out a rainbow for a kolorad ribbon, fine, but it's the same radically race-mixed, faceless onestate on both ends. >war is unnecessary
nah, it brings armed, militant nationalists like azov closer to wielding state power and creates a generation of angry, chauvinistic russian vets.