Alright so let's think about this for a minute.>The suburbs are the perfect machine to end this era.
Based on>You drive to a grocery megastore. And you don't do anything. You leave your house to go to work, you return from work, you cook or order the same food. And maybe eventually you have children who turn into headcases due to a childhood lacking in proper socialized mental stimulation or challenge.
Ok, I will take everything above as a fact.
Should I blame... "suburbs" for that?
If a suburb has a grocery store that you can go walking or by bike, does to lose the denomination of "suburbs"?
People staying in their homes doing nothing, is this caused by the "suburb" entity or by lazy indoctrinated people that have no other prospect than watching TV? You think city dwellers are not like that? Or maybe because instead of watching a movie on Netflix, they go to the movies once every 6 months and now they're socially and morally superior to those living in suburbs?
Is it the "suburbs" fault that people have no projects, tender to no garden, and don't go exploring nature? Is this an INNATE characteristic of the geographical portions outside of big cities that are mostly residential?
You think there are NO options to socialize kids in the suburbs. As there are no parks, no schools (?), no places to play sports, really, nothing. It's just a few homes and NOTHINGNESS for hundreds of kilometers. Also forget about meeting kids in your community and going exploring the nature around the suburbs, right? Kids never did that in their lives.
You sure this isn't about the people who live like you said, but it's about their geographical location and the disposition of residential single-family houses? Lmao.
There are garbage people living like garbage in the cities too, faggot. The difference is that if you have no car you're OFFICIALLY STUCK, meanwhile those who live in the suburbs are free to come and go.