>>80740656Are you the one referenced here:
>>80740621Red team question:
>>80739313>>what if this "high level insider" is legit, do they have a stake in what we are doing?If so, consider the above posed question. And how close am I with this:
>>80737837There are also some implied ideas behind that person's posting.
They are not terribly interested in our definitions of good or evil, they seem to be more interested in making sure there is some sort of order in the world and the current power structure fits that bill regardless of how it is achieved.
They don't seem to be opposed to the idea of us tackling corruption, but I get the sense that they might step in or otherwise dissuade us if we were to embark upon a path which would descend into the kind of chaos that would ensue should *all* CF related dirt make it into the public awareness.
Order must be preserved no matter what method is used. That might seem anathema to the idea of trying to root out corruption, but if you zoom out and take a longer look, it migt be better than the alternative; CF dirt leaks, all holy hell breaks loose across the globe and we descend into another dark age, or worse.
In light of that mentality, one can see how such people as the Sorosians would be allowed to develop as we have come to understand their network and operating principles.