Look, I'm on your side here, vis a vis "a lot of these people are overreacting or are being intellectually dishonest", but that also requires that WE conform to better standards. Like, when we're talking about bikini witch art, we're PROBABLY talking about http://simchamber.net/uploads/gallery/category_2/gallery_10_2_98397.png
Which is a literal bikini witch, whose art was released in preview articles, whom Holden has personally stated would be wearing LESS if he had the proper commissions.
And no, misrepresenting facts doesn't make it censorship. It means that they, the arguers, are incorrect. Why? Who knows. Maybe they were told these things, and hadn't seen contradictory proof, maybe they ARE lying, maybe they're just wrong. It's unnecessary to assume malice when ignorance will do.
Myself and another gentleman had an argument just last exalted thread where we both learned the rules better by both being wrong in our argument, and being corrected by the other.>>30894073
They don't just see people criticizing a product. They see aggressive critics demanding that the entire product not be produced. Which is censorship. Despite the fact that, by Kickstarter alone, the book in question has over 2,000 pre-ordered copies, these people believe that EVERYONE should be denied the product because it offends THEIR sensibilities.
Which, to many individuals, including and especially centrist Americans, who believe that Freedom of Speech and Expression is an exceedingly important value and law, is itself an offensive position, and they react with, potentially, excessive vehemence. >>30894440
Forgive my ignorance, but is 2.5E, as the game post-Scroll of Errata has been called, similarly too broken for you? Because that's the system I'm using to introduce it to my players, with some basic house rules. (strength to hit in Melee, and so forth.)