>>54907911>feminist pointing out how the concept of sexbots is a reflection of male insecurity
1. Why is this the case?
2. Why is this a problem?
Seriously, why the fuck do women think this is a problem? For the same reason why they're blaming "immature men" for women being childless in their 30s and 40s. For all their whining about being strong, women still haven't understood what's the epitome of manliness and what will always elevate men over women: the ability to take responsibility for ones own actions.
This is just yet another example of the feminist agenda (and female agenda in general, actually) to blame men for things they don't like, rather than starting out with the question "Is there something I myself can do to change this?".
I don't know whether or not you're a woman but I can tell for damned sure that you don't have any balls, so I'll let you in on a secret: us men don't want sexbots. We want women more than we want these artificial constructs. If we're being enthusiastic about a future filled with robotic waifus, that's because we believe there's something wrong with women. If a significant enough number of men thinks this for feminists to already start creating legal barriers to sexbots, don't you think this is a sign that there's something wrong with western women today? Or at the very least the social and legal conventions surrounding heterosexual relationships in the west?>>54907944
I have a job and live in my own bachelor pad, not that it helps in any way. The fact that you're resorting to such an accusatory non-argument proves that you're afraid. >>54907953>Capitalism is stronger than feminism.
Only as long as the law allows it to be. Remember that feminists overwhelmingly align themselves with the left, especially its more radical segments. Feminists, like the Communists of old, will reject economical truths for ideological reasons.