We only have it second hand but what this guy says is pretty much right. >>32646126
iirc there was a contradictory statement made that it was silent -- but since we have no idea who the witnesses were, and are relying on second hand reports of what they said, this is probably not hugely significant. Heck, one of them could have heard something, the other didn't notice it.>>32647467
There is no claim that it was spinning. Hovering was the word used, I think.>>32647496>analysis
This word you are using... I don't think it means what you think it means.